Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Science Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnfather, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barnfather, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, H. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluation of Two Assessment Techniques for Adaptation to Stress

Janet S. Barnfather, RN; PHD

University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI

Mary Ann Price Swain, RN; PHD

University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI

Helen C. Erickson, RN; PHD

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

Two conceptual nursing models, Roy's adaptation model and Erickson and Swain's adaptive potential assessment model are explained, and knowledge is identified within these two assessment techniques for adaptation to stress. The purpose is to identify common, noteworthy areas of nursing science as well as areas where further development in nursing knowledge is needed. A case study is used to compare and contrast these models. When assessing adaptation to stress, one simi larity between the approaches appears to be a propositional linkage that supports the influence of developmental level on basic need satisfaction. A divergent area between the two models identifies a need for further development in nursing knowledge regarding the adaptive potential sta tus. This includes information pertaining to what an individual can reasonably do or be expected to do when contending with stressors.

Key Words: Adaptation to Stress • Roy's Model • Modeling and Role-Modeling • Assessment of Adaptive Potential

Nursing Science Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 4, 172-181 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/089431848900200407


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
G. J. Mitchell and B. Pilkington
Theoretical Approaches in Nursing Practice: A Comparison of Roy and Parse
Nurs Sci Q, June 1, 1990; 3(2): 81 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]