Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Nursing Science Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Polifroni, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Packard, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Polifroni, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Packard, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Psychological Determinism and the Evolving Nursing Paradigm

E. Carol Polifroni, RN; EdD

University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT

Sheila Packard, RN; PhD

University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT

The purpose of this article is to explore three behaviorist theories and their roles within the evolving paradigm of nursing. The authors suggest that the behaviorist theories of locus of control, self-efficacy, and the health belief model are derived from deterministic philosophical premises. These premises are in direct conflict with the premise of free will. As interpreted by the authors and many others, the emerging paradigm of nursing relies on the free will of the individual, the ability of the individual to choose for himself/herself what course of action to take, to avoid, or to pursue. The authors address the psychological deterministic philosophical premises within the three theories and utilize nursing theories to compare and contrast the views of free will and determinism. Finally, they suggest that the use of borrowed and applied theories should decline when nurse scientists are true to the philosophical assumptions of theories within nursing science.

Key Words: Psychological Determinism • Free Will • Newman • Patersons & Zderad • Parse

Nursing Science Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 2, 63-68 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/089431849300600205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
W. K. Cody
Occult Reductionism in the Discourse of Theory Development
Nurs Sci Q, October 1, 1996; 9(4): 140 - 142.
[PDF]


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
S. S. Bunkers, L. A. Petardi, F. B. Pilkington, and P. A. Walls
Challenging the Myths Surrounding Qualitative Research in Nursing
Nurs Sci Q, January 1, 1996; 9(1): 33 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]